[Magic-dev] Using IBM .13 micron process and magic

[Jeff Sondeen]

I've not done this (use magic for ibm.13), however, it's hard to
imagine that magic could succeed for general layout without external
DRC checking to a vendor rule file (meaning calibre, assura or
hercules).  (slot checking is an example). also, given magic's sidehalo
limitations (as well as other missing inter-layer caps), you'd need an
accurate external extraction.  then there's the issue of generating
fill layers.

but certainly if you limit the layers and sizes that can be drawn, a
subset of the rules could probably be implemented in magic.

other thoughts ?
/jeff


Chris Fearing writes:
 > Has anyone ever used magic and the IBM .13 micron process?  I realize 
 > from mosis' web site that there are Non-disclosure agreements in place 
 > for most documentation relating to the process, but was wondering if 
 > anyone had gone through those agreements and used magic for a 
 > submission.  I also note that mosis' page says only IBM design rules 
 > are supported for this technology, so I assume using standard SCMOS 
 > rules is out, and there would need to be an IBM specific technology 
 > file written, most likely with the newer changes Timothy Edwards 
 > mentioned for supporting TSMC .13 technology.
 > 
 > Has anyone heard recent news on previous reports about a TSMC .13 
 > process supported by mosis?
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > magic-dev mailing list
 > magic-dev at vlsi.cornell.edu
 > http://vlsi.csl.cornell.edu/mailman/listinfo/magic-dev