[Magic-dev] Dumb Newbie question (a.k.a. digital design flows)
R. Timothy Edwards
tim at opencircuitdesign.com
Sat Oct 13 18:34:14 EDT 2007
Dear Simon,
> ... perhaps I missed the point of this conversation, but personally I
> have found that once spice variants gave us heirarchy and the expression
> controlled source, almost all behavioural descriptions became possible
> including "digital" blocks. To be able to partition a design into
> smaller blocks then to be able to write progressively higher level
> descriptions and compare them to "equivalent" spice netlists extracted
> directly from a layout is extremely powerful and does not involve the
> use of any other language. The only two drawbacks I know of is the
> ability of many spice variants to converge large MOS netlist with
> "totem-pole" structures and the availability of a compact register
> (flip-flop) or state-engine description, something the "behavioural"
> equation overcomes in part if you know how to write it.
The main point of Verilog or any other HDL is to be able to, for example,
declare A and B as n-bit vectors, write "A + B" or "A * B", synthesize
it, and end up with a SPICE deck or other netlist format describing an
adder or multiplier, or counter, accumulator, barrel shifter, etc.
> Personally, as a circuit design and layout oriented person, I do not see
> the need for Verilog or VHDL other than being able to "interface" with
> the (digital) system designers and to convert their efforts in something
> physical.
One recent project we implemented an LFSR (linear feedback shift register)
in Verilog, which is one of those things that is about as simple to express
in a schematic as it is to express in Verilog. Another block, though,
implemented a fairly complicated coarse-frequency auto-ranging algorithm
for controlling a VCO. This block had multiple adders, timers, counters,
and we kept changing the algorithm every few weeks (or sometimes days).
That one, I would not have wanted to do in schematic form, and especially
not as a raw netlist.
> Why add another language when we already have a perfectly good one? (spice)
Partly because SPICE is a netlist format, not a language. Furthermore, it
dates back to the punch card/batch mode era, and hasn't been substantially
updated since then. It has lasting power because a lot of people have
done a lot of work creating sophisticated device models, not because it's
a particularly good format, which it isn't.
Regards,
Tim
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Dr. R. Timothy Edwards (Tim) | email: tim at opencircuitdesign.com |
| Open Circuit Design, Inc. | web: http://opencircuitdesign.com |
| 22815 Timber Creek Lane | phone: (301) 528-9364 |
| Clarksburg, MD 20871-4001 | cell: (240) 401-0616 |
+--------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
More information about the magic-dev
mailing list