• Previous message: R. Timothy Edwards: "Re: "table-driven" techfiles"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> -------------
> 
> If there are any other aspects of the technology file which 
> are lacking,
> or which seem stupidly implemented or have become outdated, please let
> me know and we can have a discussion among the developers on 
> what to do
> about them.  Implementing "antenna rules" is the primary one 
> I can think
> of, but I'm sure there are others.
> 
> 					Regards,
> 					Tim


In this age of CMP rules, it would also be nice to check layer density.
Presently I feed a flat CIf file to a script that calculates this.  For
some reason my results don't always match with MOSIS.  It hasn't been 
a problem since my results are always lower than MOSIS, so if my
calculations pass the rules, I am good.

The other technique is to let MOSIS do the fill for you, but if I am going
to fill in white space, I just assume fill with my poly-poly2-m1-m2-m3
bypass
caps.

Mark

• Next message: Philippe Pouliquen: "Re: "table-driven" techfiles"
• Previous message: R. Timothy Edwards: "Re: "table-driven" techfiles"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]