MAGIC Magic Mailing List
 
 

From: Spaceborne Calin (spaceborne_calin AT yahoo DOT com)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2002 - 05:40:10 EST

  • Next message: R. Timothy Edwards: "magic box color"

     --- "R. Timothy Edwards" <tim AT stravinsky DOT jhuapl.edu>
    a écrit : > Dear Calin,
    > 
    > >> The magic-wrapper doesn't change the
    > >> magic executable at all.    Magic does all the
    > same
    > >> things in the same way at the same speed.
    > 
    > > I was scared that you would do as most linux
    > > programers do these days: they take an old program
    > > with "a not so friendly GUI" and convert it to a
    > > "friendly" GUI which brakes everything. Example
    > > ng-spice from GEDA which suppossed to improve
    > berkeley
    > > spice but couldn't even display the help in the
    > help
    > > window. 
    > 
    > I was just re-reading your response today, and since
    > I have been
    > working more closely with the guys at MultiGiG (John
    > Wood et al.),
    > I realize that the irony of your response is that
    > MultiGiG has
    > done a lot of the recent code changes to ng-spice! 
    > I'm not sure,
    > though, if that was what broke ng-spice, or if they
    > fixed that,
    > or if it had nothing to do with the parts MultiGiG
    > worked on.
    
    Hi
    The version of ng-spice i checked was quite old
    (ng-spice rework 10 or 11) but i'm ready to try a new
    one because the old berkeley spice compile well
    only with older gcc releases (gcc 2.91.66 - egcs
    1.1.2)
    
    
    > 
    > Actually, I have agreed to to coding work for
    > MultiGiG, mostly
    > to get them on the right track.  I am trying to get
    > them to
    > concentrate on getting the tools working under a
    > scripting
    > language environment, and consider the GUI to be
    > both secondary
    > AND optional.  To drop Tcl/Python/Perl on top of
    > magic is no
    > more of a load on resources than is embedding the
    > interpreter,
    > as Rajit did with Scheme.  From what I have so far,
    > magic
    > seems to run a lot better under Tcl than it did with
    > Scheme
    > embedded in it.
    > 
    
    I tried the multigig GUI wrapper which was presented
    in
     this mailing list but it didn't work (it was in 
    early development stage and i underestand). It seems
    that tcl is a nice language in terms of resource usage
    even on a slow machine. I bought a new PC and I'll
    install magic as soon as possible.
    
    Thanks 
    
    
    > 						---Tim
    
    
    Calin
     
    
    ___________________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse  AT yahoo DOT fr gratuite et en français !
    Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.fr
    


  •  
     
    Questions? Contact Rajit Manohar
    cornell logo