Magic Mailing List |
|
From: Brad Falch (bradleyfalch AT yahoo DOT com) Date: Tue Feb 04 2003 - 12:03:47 EST
Tim, I tried what you suggested, but I get an error when my tech file is read into magic. My cifinput looks like this: style default scalefactor 1 calmaonly nanometers layer ndiff CDF layer poly PLY calma CDF 6 30 calma PLY 17 30 And I get this message: /space/CAD/lib/magic/sys/mytech.tech27: line 1595: section cifinput: Wrong number of arguments in scalefactor statement. /space/CAD/lib/magic/sys/mytech.tech27: line 2464: section cifinput: CIF input style "default" bad scalefactor; using 1. /space/CAD/lib/magic/sys/mytech.tech27: line 2464: section cifinput: Also, if I do a grep for "nanometers" in the source code tree, it comes up empty. The 7.1 distribution I got was from the vlsi.cornell.edu page and named "magic-latest." Is the source on your site newer? How can I tell? I can't find any versioning beyond 7.1 attached to my distribution. Thanks, Brad --- "R. Timothy Edwards" <tim AT stravinsky DOT jhuapl.edu> wrote: > Dear Brad, > > > Is there a way to import GDSII/Calma that is > created > > on a 1nm grid? Since scalefactor only takes > integers, > > the minimum design grid is only 10nm. > > Magic versions 7.1 and 7.2 support > nanometer-scale input. The > technology file needs the keyword "nanometers" in > the CIF input > section. For instance, for the Chartered .13 micron > process (lambda > = 0.065), I have, in cifinput and cifoutput > sections: > > style lambda=0.065(chartered) > scalefactor 65 calmaonly nanometers > > . > . > . > > Note that when using the "nanometers" keyword, all > dimensions in > the CIF sections are in units of nanometers, not > centimicrons. > Also note that magic version 7.1 supports nanometer > dimensions > ONLY for GDS input and output, but version 7.2 > supports nanometer > dimensions for both GDS and CIF input and output > (version 7.2 > ignores the keyword "calmaonly" in the example > above). > > There is also something in the documentation about > scalefactors > having to be even numbers for CIF input/output; > this restriction > was not necessary from version 6.4 or 6.5, but the > restriction was > not lifted until version 7.1. > > Regards, > Tim __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
|
|