• Previous message: Jeff Sondeen: "Re: More on lambda & SCN6M_SUBM.10.tech27"
• In reply to: R. Timothy Edwards: "Re: ext2spice"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

 --- "R. Timothy Edwards" <tim AT stravinsky DOT jhuapl.edu> a écrit 

> 
>    I pose this question to anyone who knows the answer:  Is there
> any difference to the SPICE simulation between choosing the default
> ext2spice method of piling all area and perimeter values for a node
> on a single transistor connected to that node, and the alternate
> method ("-d" switch, UNDOCUMENTED ??) which distributes the total
> area and perimeter evenly between all transistors connected to the
> node?  Does anybody besides me even know that the "-d" switch
> exists?
> 

Hi Tim
As far as I know there is a difference in transient analysis
when those parameters are used. I think I've done this test 
some time ago and there were differences between one circuit 
and another (the other obtained with another program because
I didn't know about the "-d" switch which could make a 
difference at that time).

> 					Regards,
> 			Tim 

Bye
Calin

P.S. If I remember about this when i get home I'll try to give a 
correct answer.


___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse  AT yahoo DOT fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

• Next message: Svenn Are Bjerkem: "A problem with magic on debian"
• Previous message: Jeff Sondeen: "Re: More on lambda & SCN6M_SUBM.10.tech27"
• In reply to: R. Timothy Edwards: "Re: ext2spice"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]